FCC Tries Again to Solve Rural Call Completion Problems
Posted by Andrew Regitsky
Apr 6, 2018 10:00:00 AM
It has been almost five years since the FCC began to systematically address the troubling inability consumers and businesses have completing calls to rural areas. These problems manifest themselves in various ways, including calls that are significantly delayed, no ring on the called party’s phone, or the caller hearing false ring tones or busy signals.
FCC Proposes Special Access Incentive Regulation for Rate-Of-Return ILECs
Posted by Andrew Regitsky
Mar 30, 2018 10:00:00 AM
Last year the FCC determined that price cap ILEC special access and packet services should be almost entirely deregulated with only DS1 and DS3 transport subject to price cap regulation if the ILEC failed a highly criticized "competitive" market test. This regulatory scheme became effective on August 1, 2017 when the Business Data Services (BDS) Order took effect.
That Order put many rate-of-return (ROR) ILECs in a unique position. More than 200 ROR ILECs now receive universal service support based on a cost model called the Alternative Connect America Fund Cost Model (ACAM). In return for a fixed amount of support, these ILECs are required to meet a specified level of broadband deployment. This method to recover Connect America Fund (CAF) dollars has become very popular among ROR carriers. However, as a result, these LECS are no longer in the NECA Common Line Pool and remain subject to rate regulation only for their special access services. Some parties sought to change that.
Topics: ILECs, FCC, CLECs, commissions order, federal trade commission, Business Data Services, clec, regulatory updates, rate of return
Ninth Circuit Decision is Big Victory for FTC and FCC
Posted by Andrew Regitsky
Mar 2, 2018 10:09:02 AM
In a February 26, 2018 Opinion, the full Ninth Circuit Court in San Francisco gave the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) a huge victory when it found that a company is regulated as if it were a common carrier based on a specific "activity" rather than by "status." In other words, a non-common carrier cannot become a common carrier and escape FTC regulation for its non-common carrier services simply by providing a single common carrier service. Instead, as per usual, its common carrier services would be regulated by the FCC, but its non-common carrier services would fall under FTC authority.
The significance of this is clear. The non-common carrier services such as broadband Internet access service provided by ISPs like AT&T and Verizon will be regulated under section 5 of the FTC rules, as the FCC envisioned in its recently released Restoring Internet Freedom Order.
Here is the background for this important Opinion.
Topics: terminating traffic, direct connections, wireless, wireless carriers, bill-and-keep, small providers, service providers, Inteliquent, wholesale traffic, AT&T, ILECs, inter-carrier compensation, clec, CLECs, terminating access charges, FCC, IXC, switched access
Industry comments are due on March 14, 2018, involving one of the weirdest filings to come before the FCC in a long time. In a Petition for Expedited Declaratory Ruling (Petition) filed by South Dakota Networks (SDN) on February 7, 2018 in Docket 18-41, SDN requests the Commission to issue a declaratory ruling asserting that in a dispute between it and Northern Valley Communications, Inc. (NVC) involving interstate switched access traffic:
A contract between SDN and AT&T, negotiated to terminate large volumes of traffic originally bound to a CLEC (NVC) engaged in access stimulation is lawful; and,CLECs, such as NVC, enjoy no exclusive right to transport terminating traffic to their end offices (or elsewhere). Moreover, the filing of a federal tariff by a CLEC, does not confer a right to compel other carriers to use the tariffed services.
Topics: terminating traffic, direct connections, wireless, wireless carriers, bill-and-keep, small providers, service providers, Inteliquent, wholesale traffic, AT&T, ILECs, inter-carrier compensation, clec, CLECs, terminating access charges, FCC, IXC, switched access, terminating switched access, federal tariff
Even with inter-carrier compensation reform, some bad actors continue to abuse the remaining price differences in switched access charges to enrich themselves. These arbitrage opportunities exist because rural ILECs were not required to reduce terminating tandem-switched transport to bill-and-keep maintaining their access revenues and originating switched access charges were never reformed at all by the FCC.
On the terminating side, some LECs continue to contract out with enterprises that generate large numbers of terminating calls and split the excess access revenues. Next week, we will discuss this issue of access stimulation (or traffic pumping) and review a current case where the FCC will determine whether IXCs must utilize the tariffs of LECs engaged in such a practice.
Topics: terminating traffic, direct connections, wireless, wireless carriers, bill-and-keep, small providers, service providers, Inteliquent, wholesale traffic, AT&T, 8yy, 8yy query charges, ILECs, inter-carrier compensation, clec, CLECs, terminating access charges, FCC
Subscribe to our Blog
Recent Posts
Posts by Topic
- FCC (257)
- regulatory updates (248)
- CLECs (99)
- carrier access rates (87)
- LECs (72)
- Net Neutrality (62)
- intercarrier compensation (62)
- Telco Access Alert (61)
- ILECs (59)
- TelView (50)
- rate and tariff data (49)
- special access (43)
- IP Network (31)
- Open Internet (29)
- Tariff Transmittal Alert (27)
- Broadband (26)
- Business Data Services (16)
- ISPs (16)
- switched access (12)
- TDM (10)
- Universal Service Fund (10)
- CCMI (9)
- Intrastate Access Filing 2013 (9)
- Intrastate Access Filings 2014 (8)
- internet freedom (8)
- Ethernet (7)
- internet regulation (7)
- IP Transformation (6)
- Interconnection Agreements (6)
- bill-and-keep (6)
- federal trade commission (6)
- webinar (6)
- VoIP (5)
- clec (5)
- privacy (5)
- terminating traffic (5)
- wireless (5)
- BYOD (4)
- CABSdb Pro (4)
- Inteliquent (4)
- Intrastate Access Filings 2015 (4)
- ajit pai (4)
- commissions order (4)
- congress (4)
- direct connections (4)
- inter-carrier compensation (4)
- internet freedom order (4)
- open internet order (4)
- service providers (4)
- small providers (4)
- telecom rate research tools (4)
- trump (4)
- wholesale traffic (4)
- wireless carriers (4)
- AT&T (3)
- CRA (3)
- Enterprise Market (3)
- Enterprise Users (3)
- Mobility (3)
- Technology Transition (3)
- Telecom Expense Management (3)
- USOCs (3)
- access charges (3)
- ftc (3)
- net neutrality order (3)
- terminating access charges (3)
- terminating switched access (3)
- CPM (2)
- ICAs (2)
- IXC (2)
- LATA (2)
- Negotiate Enterprise Communications Deals (2)
- Network Services Procurement (2)
- Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (2)
- T-mobile (2)
- VoIP tariffs (2)
- congressional review (2)
- internet traffic (2)
- open internet preservation act (2)
- supreme court (2)
- telecom (2)
- 8yy (1)
- 8yy query charges (1)
- Ben Fox (1)
- Cloud (1)
- Connect American Fund (1)
- Intrastate Access Filings 2016 (1)
- MOU charges (1)
- NNP (1)
- Net Express (1)
- NetExpress (1)
- NetPricer (1)
- O1 Communications (1)
- Press & News (1)
- RFP (1)
- RFP documents (1)
- RFPs (1)
- SB-460 (1)
- SEA-US (1)
- TC2 (1)
- Telecom Summit (1)
- Title II (1)
- USF (1)
- United States (1)
- arbitrage schemes (1)
- broadband deployment (1)
- broadband deployment advisory committee (1)
- broadband report (1)
- california (1)
- california senate (1)
- call completion (1)
- call termination (1)
- call terminations (1)
- competitive sourcing (1)
- federal tariff (1)
- hawaii (1)
- hawaii telcom (1)
- hawaiian telcom (1)
- independent carriers (1)
- infrastructure deals (1)
- international roaming (1)
- litigation (1)
- nationwide number portability (1)
- network services (1)
- networking deals (1)
- rate of return (1)
- stakeholder management (1)
- telecom mergers (1)
- telecommunications act (1)
- toll free numbers (1)
- vendor proposals (1)
- wireless broadband (1)
Comment